What Does It Take?

I think we can all agree that when Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was yelling allu akbar while beheading US journalist Daniel Pearl, that was an act of terrorism. So why when 21year old Arid Uka screams the same words while gunning down American Soldiers in Germany, is it not terrorism?

German Prosecutor Griesbaum told reporters that the suspect (I hate saying that when we know it was him) told German police he went to the airport with the intent to shoot “as revenge for the American mission in Afghanistan.” But the White House refuses to call it terrorism. He had been spending an extended amount of time on radical islamic (terrorist) websites and had expressed his hateful views on facebook. State Department mouthpiece P.J. (muslim brotherhood is secular) Crowley when asked if the murder of two U.S. airmen was a terrorist attack said: "Was the shooting of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords a terrorist attack? I mean, you have to look at the evidence and look at the motivation and then you make a judgment." So a mentally deranged psycho who has been stalking a congresswoman and a radical islamic fundamentalist are the same thing? That's insulting to the mentally deranged.

Ultimately this is no surprise, we are talking about the same White House that switched out the words "terrorist attack" for "man made disaster". Obama was supposed to be the one to bring peace to the world, he was supposed change the ill feelings George Bush created. Though somehow with all the changes to our vocabulary, bowing and other playing nice Obama is doing, from the looks of things they hate us more. Again, no surprise, I've always told the liberals that Islam hates them more than conservatives. 

Oh and it is also no surprise, how the MSM is glossing over this story like it's just another random act of violence. CBS and NBC both gave brief mentions of the tragedy beyond ten minutes into the nightly broadcast, ABC had a bit more depth in their coverage, but only the first night, by the second night it was gone altogether. I'll be the first to say FOXNEWS isn't as "fair and balanced" as they claim, but when every other station is equivalent to state controlled media... Well let's just say there's a reason foxnews is the highest rated news channel.

The best news to come out of this is that the terrorist would have kept shooting but his gun jammed. Now we already know from the Ft. Hood massacre that one guy committing mass murder in the name of radical islam is not terrorism, so my question is, how many does it take? Now we know 19 men hijacking and crashing planes for the same reason is terrorism, so if the German shooter had a partner would that be enough, or does he need 18 more guys?